DAILY NEWS Sep 17, 2012 9:21 AM - 0 comments

Shell uncertain over economics of oilsands CCS

TEXT SIZE bigger text smaller text
By: HazMat Staff
09/17/2012 2012-09-17

While a landmark oilsands carbon capture project begins in Alberta to bury some one million tonnes of greenhouse gases per year, the company responsible is hoping it won’t be buried along with them as storage costs soar.

Led by Royal Dutch Shell PLC, project “Quest” aims to gather carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from the Scotford upgrader, a huge oilsands operation northeast of Edmonton, and pipe them to a site 80 kilometres north. The gases would then be injected 2.3 kilometres below the surface, where they would eventually cling to deep-rooted rocks.

Quest is backed by the Alberta government to the tune of $745 million, with the federal government adding an additional $120 million. 

The province created an enticement for Shell under its Alberta Carbon Offset System. The company can sell its carbon credits, plus bonus ones. The company was offered a two-for-one credit ($30) per tonne of carbon buried. Despite the project’s huge $1.35-billion price tag, Quest’s carbon credits would mean it pays only $155 million over the project’s first decade of operation.

On the European market, a tonne of carbon currently trades for about $10.

While the savings seem significant, carbon capture storage (CCS) is still viewed as purely a move to protect the environment, not a company’s bottom line. Provincial and federal offsets notwithstanding, Quest officials speculate it costs upwards of $72 per tonne to manage a CCS project.

The Alberta government is currently examining the possibility of raising the price of carbon.

According to the Pembina Institute, Alberta is counting on CCS to deliver 70 per cent of the emission reductions it needs to hit its 2050 emission reduction target.

----This story originally appeared on EcoLog.com on September 14, 2012. -----



Horizontal ruler
Horizontal Ruler

Post A Comment

Disclaimer
Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that Hazardous Material Magazine has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published and those that are published will not be edited. However, all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Your Name (this will appear with your post) *

Email Address (will not be published) *

Comments *



* mandatory fields

Multimedia Center


Current IssueMagazine

Digital Edition
This award-winning quarterly magazine provides you with in-depth analysis of current issues related to environmental performance,emergency response, safety and waste management.

Go To: Digital Edition
Go To: Print Archives
Go To: Subscribe

thumb Remedying Risk Assessment
The terms “remediation” and “dig-and-dump” are, for some, mutually exclusive. Just what are we “remedying” by excavating and dumping soil in a landfill?
By Theresa Phillips

thumb HazWastes lead new EPR regimes
Cradle-to-cradle manufacturing is the Holy Grail for advocates of sustainable manufacturing and packaging, and so-called extended producer responsibility (EPR) is the way to get there, according to them.
By Guy Crittenden

Go To More News From This Issue


Classifieds
Go To More Classified Ads


Sponsors