DAILY NEWS Mar 13, 2013 2:11 PM - 0 comments

BC not ready for supertanker oil spills, says fed watchdog

These supertankers have the potential to spill up to 300,000 tonnes of oil

TEXT SIZE bigger text smaller text
By: HazMat Staff
2013-03-13

A report from Canada’s Environment Commissioner warns that federal disaster plans for oil spills have not kept pace with the increase of supertankers exporting oil from British Columbia (B.C.) ports.

In a February 2013 report, Environment Commissioner Scott Vaughan wrote that supertanker trips off the West Coast are expected to quadruple in the coming years to meet the demand for natural gas and oil sands crude. In 2010, B.C. averaged 600 supertankers, but that number could soar to 2,400 in the near future, Vaughan warned.

These supertankers, Vaughan wrote, have the potential to spill up to 300,000 tonnes of oil. Federal disaster response plans, however, are only capable of handling spills up to 10,000 tonnes.

In part, the “2012 Fall Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development” addressed the issue of Canada’s ability to handle a large oil spill as a response to environmental petitions by non-profits like EcoJustice and Sierra Club of Canada.

“You don't have to be a radical to understand the threat of a 300 per cent increase in tanker traffic off the West Coast,” said John Bennett, executive director at Sierra Club of Canada, in a February 2013 public statement following the release of Scott’s report.

Vaughan’s report also confirmed the risk that the current $1.3 billion per spill maritime liability limit for tankers “may not be sufficient in the wake of a major spill from a vessel in Canadian waters.”

The federal government has since indicated that it is reviewing liability requirements. Soon after Scott’s report was tabled in Parliament on February 5, 2013, Prime Minister Stephen Harper responded to the assertion that Canada’s precautionary measures are lagging. 

“I think the government has already been clear that responsible resource development means that as we see the growth in resource development over the decades to come, there will have to be enhanced measures of environmental protection,” Harper told the House of Commons.

This news item first appeared in EcoLog News. To learn how to subscribe, visit www.ecolog.com


Horizontal ruler
Horizontal Ruler

Post A Comment

Disclaimer
Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that Hazardous Material Magazine has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published and those that are published will not be edited. However, all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Your Name (this will appear with your post) *

Email Address (will not be published) *

Comments *



* mandatory fields

Multimedia Center


Current IssueMagazine

Digital Edition
This award-winning quarterly magazine provides you with in-depth analysis of current issues related to environmental performance,emergency response, safety and waste management.

Go To: Digital Edition
Go To: Print Archives
Go To: Subscribe

thumb Remedying Risk Assessment
The terms “remediation” and “dig-and-dump” are, for some, mutually exclusive. Just what are we “remedying” by excavating and dumping soil in a landfill?
By Theresa Phillips

thumb HazWastes lead new EPR regimes
Cradle-to-cradle manufacturing is the Holy Grail for advocates of sustainable manufacturing and packaging, and so-called extended producer responsibility (EPR) is the way to get there, according to them.
By Guy Crittenden

Go To More News From This Issue


Classifieds
Go To More Classified Ads


Sponsors